Project Overview
Soil microbial communities play a pivotal role in the maintenance of plant community diversity and structure. Two important groups of microbes that contribute to structuring plant communities are pathogens and mutualists. Soil-borne pathogens maintain community level plant diversity, as accumulation of species-specific pathogens around a tree suppresses recruitment of that species’ offspring. This ‘conspecific negative density dependence’ (CNDD), prevents any one species from dominating and allows a diversity of species to establish. However, trees also accumulate plant mutualists, or beneficial microbes, particularly mycorrhizal fungi. Although historically, CNDD is explained through negative pathogen effects, mycorrhizal fungi may influence the net outcome, as species-specific, or high specificity, interactions with these mutualists could drive improved recruitment near the parent tree, counteracting pathogen-driven reduced recruitment. Further, the strength of the tradeoff between mutualist and pathogen effects on CNDD may be mediated by both the specificity of the mutualist and environmental limitations on microbial distribution. Different types of mycorrhizal fungi should differ systematically in their ability to weaken pathogen-driven CNDD, with a positive recruitment effect stronger in trees associating with higher specificity mutualists.
In this ambitious project, we will test for the relative contribution of mutualists and pathogens, as well mycorrhizal specificity, to CNDD. We will also study the impact of environmental variables on the distribution of these major plant-associated soil microbial groups worldwide, linking this distribution to global forest diversity. In collaboration with plot PIs, we are leveraging the ForestGEO network established by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) to link the composition of the plant microbiome at a local scale to processes occurring at the scale of an entire forest and across the globe.
Soil microbial communities play a pivotal role in the maintenance of plant community diversity and structure. Two important groups of microbes that contribute to structuring plant communities are pathogens and mutualists. Soil-borne pathogens maintain community level plant diversity, as accumulation of species-specific pathogens around a tree suppresses recruitment of that species’ offspring. This ‘conspecific negative density dependence’ (CNDD), prevents any one species from dominating and allows a diversity of species to establish. However, trees also accumulate plant mutualists, or beneficial microbes, particularly mycorrhizal fungi. Although historically, CNDD is explained through negative pathogen effects, mycorrhizal fungi may influence the net outcome, as species-specific, or high specificity, interactions with these mutualists could drive improved recruitment near the parent tree, counteracting pathogen-driven reduced recruitment. Further, the strength of the tradeoff between mutualist and pathogen effects on CNDD may be mediated by both the specificity of the mutualist and environmental limitations on microbial distribution. Different types of mycorrhizal fungi should differ systematically in their ability to weaken pathogen-driven CNDD, with a positive recruitment effect stronger in trees associating with higher specificity mutualists.
In this ambitious project, we will test for the relative contribution of mutualists and pathogens, as well mycorrhizal specificity, to CNDD. We will also study the impact of environmental variables on the distribution of these major plant-associated soil microbial groups worldwide, linking this distribution to global forest diversity. In collaboration with plot PIs, we are leveraging the ForestGEO network established by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) to link the composition of the plant microbiome at a local scale to processes occurring at the scale of an entire forest and across the globe.
Capacity Building
We look forward to building local capacity in using microbiome metabarcoding data. To this end, we are planning a series of workshops to share basic analyses for the microbiome data generated from ForestGEO plots using open access tools. We hope this will allow all collaborators to fully benefit from the resulting metabarcoding data to answer many more questions relevant to each individual plot. Additional capacity building is in development.
We look forward to building local capacity in using microbiome metabarcoding data. To this end, we are planning a series of workshops to share basic analyses for the microbiome data generated from ForestGEO plots using open access tools. We hope this will allow all collaborators to fully benefit from the resulting metabarcoding data to answer many more questions relevant to each individual plot. Additional capacity building is in development.
